Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nysus
It's the producer / owned of the content that is required to hold onto the 2257, and affiliates would merely be 'licensed' for free to use your content but would have to link to a page that lists your main 2257 holder's name/address/contact information, etc...
|
It's good that you have a reasonable handle on the old 2257 regs, but where have you been the last few months? Unless what has just passed into law is considerably softer than the original proposals, one major difference is that
everyone displaying sexually explicit material is now responsible for keeping their own records.
As someone else noted, the only way to get affiliates who want to use more than heavily censored content off the hook, is if the sponsor hosts the content and the affiliate is therefore not the page/site operator.