Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr.Fiction
I don't think so because of free speech issues.
Even if it did apply to them, how hard would it be for Pepsi to get Britney Spear's 2257? It would be easy. These companies, the big movie studios for example, are putting out a very limited amount of product and they do so much paperwork already that their legal department's probably wouldn't even notice the new rules.
|
Good points, but I am thinking like (using your example) if Poopsi broadcasted a Britney commercial (an explicit one, as most are) on the web, would we see a 2257 link at the bottom of the page? Same thing for CK and Abercrombie and all the rest of the more racy advertisers.
You are right on the legal dept. stuff though, a drop in the bucket to them.
My question, and point I guess, is will the DOJ be just as hard on everyone else? So many people are asking questions about like non-nude and what will apply to those images, etc. and the internet's NN world is very close to or as tame as some mainstream ads I have seen.