05-19-2005, 01:16 PM
|
|
|
I'm Lenny2 Bitch
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: On top of my soapbox
Posts: 13,449
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AaronM
*sigh*
Proposed regulations: Section 75.2 paragraph (D)
"(d) For any record created or amended after [insert date 30 days after publication of the final rule in the Federal Register], all such records shall be organized alphabetically, or numerically where appropriate, by the legal name of the performer (by last or family name, then first or given name), and shall be indexed or cross-referenced to each alias or other name used and to each title or identifying number of the book, magazine, film, videotape, computer-generated image, digital image, picture, or other matter (including but not limited to Internet computer site or services). If the producer subsequently produces an additional book, magazine, film, videotape, computer-generated image, digital image, or picture, or other matter (including but not limited to Internet computer site or services) that contains one or more visual depictions of actual sexually explicit conduct made by a performer for whom he maintains records as required by this part, the producer shall add the additional title or identifying number and the names of the performer to the existing records and such records shall thereafter be maintained in accordance with this paragraph."
It's called a GRANDFATHER CLAUSE!
Jesus Christ.......Get a clue people.
|
I asked my attorney about your grandfather clause theory back when these new regs were first proposed. He doesn't think what you're saying is going to hold up.
However it's a moot point anyways, this thing will be tied up in court for years.
__________________
sig too big
|
|
|