View Single Post
Old 05-17-2005, 10:48 PM  
Mr.Fiction
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Free Speech Land
Posts: 9,484
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear
Kind of a vague request..

Personally i dont want to see either of those topics BUT my opinion is irrelevant..

Basically ccbill is saying that BEFORE the "line" was "the law" now it seems they are making a personal "line".

"violent content" and "watersports" can cover alot of areas. i.e. "squirting" "cumshots" "rough sex" etc etc

Thats a rather hard request to live up to because each site will be up to ccbill's discrection ( as it always was ) to allow or dissallow.

In a nutshell it would be rather hard to say WEBSITE A will be allowed by epoch but not by ccbill. Its easy to say , if its not legal it wont be allowed , its harder when the "line" is fuzzy..
You're right, it's a slippery slope.

What one person considers "violent" another considers BDSM or some other totally acceptable fetish.

As long as consenting adults are involved, what's the problem that people have with it?

Some of you don't want a credit card to process for an adult site because you don't like that specific fetish?

How about all of the people that don't think credit cards should be processing for porn at all. Should they get their way too?
__________________
Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU | Free Speech Coalition | EFF | IMPA
Mr.Fiction is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote