Backov: I never said I didn't img src'd anybody, I said I didn't perform any DOS attacks. Not the same thing... check the law on this one and you'll be quite surprised. Granted, it's a harsh way of solving problems, but so far I have used this tool SOLELY for people that kept bombarding me with spam, stole my links and laughed when I told 'em to stop (and all of 'em stopped after the img src) or people that blind linked their thumbs to dialer traps and console loops once traffic started to come in. Not on innocent parties. Again, this is not a DOS attack, this is people that wanted my traffic. Some through stealing my content, some through redirecting the visitors elsewhere. All I do is give 'em some of that traffic. If there was other ways to fight this I would, but unfortunately this is pretty much the only tool one can use at the moment. And very efficient as well. People should realise they can't just get away with cheating. And since there's no Internet Police out there to go after people who cheat on people I have to take my own measures...
Nysus:
Quote:
|
People make mistakes, and I'm sure even people who are pro. I also think people would expect this more and I think with the reduced amount of people submitting
|
Don't worry, it's easy to spot the difference between someone who is making a mistake or someone that is cheating. People don't link to childporn by mistake...
Another idea just occured to me... It could go through phone or snailmail. People could get a code though one of those ways. What the key is to fighting cheaters/content stealers is registering. Problem is that instead of making me millions like CodeCrawler is predicting, this will only cost. I'd like a system that would break even... Combining it with an auto-submitter could be a solution, but I see some problems in that as well, those are the same problems I posted before about the auto-submitters themselves. But everything can be discussed of course