Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bhutocracy
why even build it when you can have it built AND managed for nothing and get paid for sending it traffic?
Dude... designing microsoft.com doesn't mean Bill Gates is managing your shit for you lol.. Whilst it's a good thing to have done a tour the way you like it and send traffic to it, please don't even begin to try to compare it with owning your own shit lol.
|
"designing microsoft.com doesn't mean Bill Gates is managing your shit for you lol.."
But it does mean he is managing my shit and I am using his system to make money through it n this "INTERWEB" that I made or AL GOre Made as some people are not sure which around here.
There is a comparison without having the liability. Hell one program even offers you a stake in the company based on the amount of members you send to create a vested interest in the company as an option.
Just because you have a lack of vision in seeing how it really is or works by the numbers is not my problem...
However, another reality is your members are not actually your members if you own an affilaites program.
They technically belong to the processor and an affiliate program owner can not really do dick in some cases regarding what happens to there base when shit comes to shove with a processor. I think we have seen this a few times in adult history where the processor will not release a member database since technically it's theres.
Again an affiliates program is technically a management company in most cases.