Quote:
|
Originally Posted by polle45
 Year the hell i know that but have you seen the Properties of the Lense on the 828 ??? it does the same as 3 very expensive canon. Plus there is addons to the lense of the 828 that gives it other special features.
I just wonna know if its stupid to buy the Sony instead og the Canon because i will loose ALLOT ?! |
The properties of a lense don't always fully indicate the quality. A zoom lense with a wide range, like the one on the Sony, has to compromise on a number of things compared to more specialized lenses. So, for instance, a cheap 50 mm Canon lens will most likely yield way better quality than the lens on this Sony will at 50 mm.
Aside from that, from the looks of the reviews, it seems the Sony has some significant problems and overall isn't as good a camera as the 350D:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sonydscf828/page21.asp
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos350d/page28.asp
For you, though, the Sony would probably be a better and more practical choice. It seems like you wouldn't use multiple lenses (and don't need to), so an slr probably isn't something you need.