Slave breeding didn't go on a large scale for 400 years. Maybe on a small, regional, localized basis. In fact, up until the British banned Slave transatlanctic transport in the 1820s it was cheaper to supplement their slave force by buying new additions instead of breeding replacements. After 1820s, it became profitable to breed slaves because of lack of steady inputs of new imported slaves.
So, it's not exactly 400 years of mass scale genetic tampering and breeding.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by opflix
lol... you think 400 years of slavery in AMERICA didn't effect the blacks who descended from that very practice? please man... most black people IN AMERICA are here because of slavery and were bred like animals because that's how black people saw them. note that most black people in america are not "black" skinned either. none of them are pure because of slavery & owners fraternizing (raping or having relationships) with their female property. its not a hypoethesis, its fact. black people didn't hop on some boat voluntarily and say, "hey, i wanna live in america, the home of the brave where all people are equal".... fuck all that, they got here because of slavery & black men today are the result of that.
if you haven't noticed, black american men are built stronger & more muscular than black africans. why? once again, white people - to their credit - have bred the super negro & now "he" is superior athletically because of that while the white man simply runs the show. that is fact.
...
|