Quote:
|
Originally Posted by $5 submissions
So you subscribe to a "genetic" explanation to "race"? Even if the black slave breeding hypothesis is to be accepted do you think the 'breeding' was extensive enough and went on for long enough to fundamentally affect physical differences among groups?
I've always been afraid of 'genetic' explanations to cultural/political/social issues since cultural perception shapes pretty much everything we interpret as 'reality.'
Sowell's written a ton of stuff about this.
|
lol... you think 400 years of slavery in AMERICA didn't effect the blacks who descended from that very practice? please man... most black people IN AMERICA are here because of slavery and were bred like animals because that's how black people saw them. note that most black people in america are not "black" skinned either. none of them are pure because of slavery & owners fraternizing (raping or having relationships) with their female property. its not a hypoethesis, its fact. black people didn't hop on some boat voluntarily and say, "hey, i wanna live in america, the home of the brave where all people are equal".... fuck all that, they got here because of slavery & black men today are the result of that.
if you haven't noticed, black american men are built stronger & more muscular than black africans. why? once again, white people - to their credit - have bred the super negro & now "he" is superior athletically because of that while the white man simply runs the show. that is fact.
...