View Single Post
Old 06-06-2002, 05:22 PM  
FATPad
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,693
Quote:
Originally posted by codecrawler
Also the $ 3 they spend does not guarantee placement they could very well be declined or end up on the overflow(And we all know how well that converts)

If it guaranteed placement (No matter where top or bottom) that would be another story, that would be a good deal.

But the proposal as is stinks for the gallerybuilder

CC
No it doesn't. It's not a good deal for some of the gallerybuilders. For those gallery builders, the option to stop submitting and find their own traffic is always an alternative.
__________________
<a href="http://www.adultcontent.co.uk">Adult Content UK - Great British Content</a>
FATPad is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote