I should qualify the last part of my last post some. From what I can figure out from the article, R Kelly isn't charged with having sex with a minor, he's charged with making, distributing and possessing child pornography.
What needs to be clear is: it is okay to have sex with a girl that is over the legal age of consent.
It is NOT okay to make a movie of it and distribute it. (the article says it was being sold on the streets of major cities)
It's easy to get confused. The simple truth is
having sex w legal teen=ok (legally, but probably not morally for a guy his age)
distributing movie of that sex=not ok
|