Below are the links that Dr. John Berryhill mentioned during my interview with him last night.
http://www.arb-forum.com/domains/decisions/428848.htm
Lately, this Panel is seeing a very disturbing trend, namely, an increasing number of ICANN complaints which at their core are nothing more than broad business disputes that happen to be colored by allegations of cybersquatting, where on close examination the latter are often found quite wanting. Such complaints have absolutely no basis being before an ICANN panel. Nevertheless, as this Panel surmises, they are intentionally filed, simply as a "strong arm" tactic to exert sufficient leverage on a respondent, through a modality that is typically much less expensive and much more time-efficient than conventional litigation, in order to force that respondent to desist from whatever activity the complainant happens to find offensive.
http://arbiter.wipo.int/domains/sear....html?lang=eng
WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions