Damn, I figured that was the next question..
Ok
#1 -
The questin in and of itself is a bit confusing, as it seems as tho it was a questions asked, after you were given information prior to the question..
But based just on the question, I said False:
The defense & prosecution have the right to preemptory challenge when choosing a jury. The defendant would not have to prove that it was racially motivated, unless he felt that such was the case..
#2 -
The protection against double jeopardy -- being tried more than once for the same crime -- stems from a short phrase in the 5th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: "...nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb."
#3 -
Just makes sense. any relationship will get better with communication. The prosecutors & police are looking for the same outcome from the capture and prosection of a bad guy. The better they communicate, the better the relationship will be.
#4 -
I changed my mind, I'd have to say that is probably true... There are cases where in one state or county, a persons "crime" may be determined to be either a felony, or not based on that the DA feels, if he got laid the night before, if it's close to re-election time, I feel they do take all that into account when deciding how to charge someone.