Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tony404
wait you people who support .xxx said that could never happen hmmm
|
The "establishment" regardless of country, state or city will always be gunning for porn ... ALWAYS!
Here's two key paragraphs though that you should keep in mind ...
Quote:
|
The new Utah law is considered likely to face a constitutional challenge similar to that faced by a now-defunct Pennsylvania law that was similar to Utah's. The American Civil Liberties Union is considering litigation to thwart the law, with director Dani Eyer telling the Tribune that Sunderlage's position should be enough to alarm people about hidden agendas by those backing that particular law.
|
Quote:
|
Pennsylvania's Net blocking law was struck down in federal court last September, with a judge ruling the law ? aimed at trying to curtail child porn ? was ineffective at blocking child porn but too effective in blocking more than a million websites without any sexual content.
|
The one thing I think most people always miss when trashing/negating .XXX as a viable alternative - is one simple fact ... when or IF an ISP decides to block the TLD - it creates an opportunity for another ISP to say "Come to US! We will NEVER BLOCK content that is Constitutionally legal!"
There are other positive things that could result from .XXX but let the FLAMES begin!
.