View Single Post
Old 04-21-2005, 09:34 AM  
Anthony
Keyboard Warrior
 
Anthony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: One of the outer rings of Hell
Posts: 9,653
Quote:
Originally Posted by ModelPerfect
I have to agree and disagree. There is no substitute for the real deal. Not even grappling fully resisting opponents is complete preparation. Grappling someone on a mat who isn't striking at you, even if he's resisting every technique, is not the same as grappling on asphault with a guy wanting nothing more than to punch in your throat or gouge out you eyes. But it's the best we've got without maiming each other so much that we won't be able to train again tomorrow. But I do like grappling because purely on a technique basis, it gives you an opportunity to train hard against unwilling opponents without really getting hurt. No other art, other than grappling arts, really has that advantage...

Street-effective striking arts can't really do that. If I finger strike to the eyes, kick the knees or punch someone in the throat, I'm obviously not going to do that for real while sparring. So you're basically going through the motions, and opponents continue the sparring session basically as if it never happened. So it's not realistic, but it's the best we got without maiming someone. Like I said before, I love grappling, but on the street my grappling will entail much more than I practice on the mat. Namely, I'm taking an eyeball for a souvenir. So even grappling isn't fully representative of the street...in fact in most cases it seems people habituate themselves away from strikes when grappling because most people don't train that way. That in itself is detrimental to street effectiveness.

By the same token, Aikido has similar limitations as the karate example. I'd agree that the majority of aikido is not street effective, but that's not 'real' aikido imho. But as a bouncer, I can say real aikido is effective. You mentioned some schools have changed their approach to make it more effective for the modern world, but that's 180 degrees opposite of what's happening. The aikido as taught by O'Sensei is effective, but modern systems have changed it into some loopy, hippie non-effective dance. I'm lucky enough to study with a street-fighter who trained directly under O'Sensei. We're not afraid of resisting partners, but there is still the same problem as with the karate example. We use atemi (strikes) to distract our opponents, but we're not going to strike someone in the eye for real in the dojo. Futhermore, if I told you I was going to do a grappling sankaku-jime on you, you'd probably easily resist it because you knew I was going for it. Likewise, if I said I was going to punch in you the face NOW, it'd be easy to block. So also likewise, if you knew I was going to do an aikido ikkyo, that would be resistable. But if you didn't expect it and/or if I struck you first, the situation would be different.

Good points. But let me just address two of them.

When I speak of grappling, I talk of Brazillian Jiu Jitsu. While most detractors will cite that it is a sport and has no real world application, they fail to realize that our "sport" was created to mimick real life situations.

We win points on take down. We win points on having dominant position, ie, Side Control, Full Mount, and the highest points to rear mount. We also win by submission, meaning that if our opponent did not tap in a sport enviroment, he would lose the use of an arm, leg, joint, neck, or be plain out cold to a blood or air choke. BJJ is all about dominant position. It is extremely hard for anyone untrained in fighting on the ground to poke my eyes out, strike at me with any force, whatever, when I'm on top and control his movement. While I have total free reign to do whatever I want, strike, eye poke, choke, etc.

I can't think of any other martial art that has a sportive side that mimicks combat as well as BJJ does.

Now onto Aikido. O Sensei softened Aikido post WWII, and took away alot of it's resemblance to Daito Ryu Jitsu. There aren't many instructors still alive that trained with O Sensei, what is your instructor's name? I agree that the hippy bullshit has made Aikido a watered down dance. When I made mentioned of Modern Aikido, that I've seen has changed, is the integration of grappling after the take down.

Nikkyo Nage end pin is similliar to BJJ's Omo Plato in execution. The sholder is torqued past it's limit. Aikido uses the arms, BJJ uses the legs. I've powered out of Nikkyo Nage Pin, while I have never powered out of Omo Plato. The difference is what is used to do the technique. My legs will always be stronger than my arms.

I bought into Aikido's charms a long time ago and spent years training in it. To my chagrin, I got tooled by Dig420 who weighs 70lbs less than me and was only training in BJJ for 5 months.
Anthony is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote