Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AaronM
You don't want much, do you?
Your name is quite fitting.
|
Do you even want to try and do a cost comparison?
Webmaster does site design, updates, etc
Photograher makes the content, cleans the photos, etc
Webmaster covers hosting costs
Photographer covers costs of locations, lighting, equipment (including DV tapes, batteries, etc.) talent, sometimes transportation.
Webmaster gets to do his job at his liesure. (Ok, there are deadlines and you work hard)
Photographer has to deal with finding girls, girls who flake, men without boners, egos, schedule nightmares, expired H.I.V tests, cleaning the set. (Do you really want to do the job of sperm mopper or babywipe pick'r up'r?) The list goes on.
Exclusive site content is not cheap. Even a standard no-nonsense boy-girl sex sans anal is easily over a thousand bucks. So if you did a weekly update and just kept it vanilla sex.
In a best case scenario you are looking at 52k a year.
All in all... I think both sides have alot of investment. A 50/50 partnership and each person does what they do best is more than fair.