Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Headless
How can it not be considered art? If a designer uses photoshop to make a design, and a designer uses photoshop to make a chop wouldnt they both be considered art? Take into consideration the fact that for each the designer must use his artistic abilities to make the final product.
Its a very iffy subject if you ask me...
|
In the case of a photochop, you've reproduced the photographers copyrighted work by means of adaptation. Violating one of their exclusive rights.
Regardless of the fact that you've created a new image, your piece of "art" lacks originality. There was no independent creation because you started with someone elses copyrighted images.