http://www.funsforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=1331
The above link is a website surfer board. Always has great feed back on sites. The above link was a thread posted about one of the teenrev sites. This is why they dont rebill. There is not even 1000 pictures in the members area.
Text from the post if you dont want to go to that board
--------------------------------------------
"There are 22 sets of still photos, typically about 3 dozen pics per set, 809 pictures in all. The pictures are large and of pretty good quality, but there's not a lot of variety in the sets. Most of the sets are nude posing, a few are masturbation with fingers. Only 17 of the sets are actually linked from the members page. There are five other sets that are not linked, but whose existence can be inferred from the gaps in the numbering. One of the 'hidden' sets is a quasi-lesbian set with a blonde friend. I say quasi because from the photos you could conclude that they were pantomiming actual sex (e.g. no actual lip-to-clit contact, &c.) But see the video descriptions, below.
There are 7 videos, in either mpg or wmv, with 'high-speed' and 'low-speed' compression. Most of the videos are about 10-11 minutes long, one is only a couple of minutes. Three of the videos are lesbian encounters, with a lot more vigor than the photos implied. The other videos are single-girl masturbation (fingers only). Chloe seems to be interesting in masturbating in semi-public places. The videos have no music, only a natural sound track, but Chloe doesn't make a lot of noise. Technically, the videos were very disappointing. The mpgs are only 352x240 resolution and pretty heavily compressed. The wmvs are 400x300 but even more compressed. Not even close to DVD quality.
Disturbingly, the videos revealed the presence of three tattoos across Chloe's pubic mound, which have apparently been skillfully "airbrushed" out of the stills. This came as quite a surprise to me; while a lot more modest than some I've seen, the tattoos aren't very attractive.
There are some other technical problems. The set numbering is obnoxiously out of sequence. The preview page says you can e-mail Chloe from the members page; that's a lie. The unlinked sets I've already mentioned. There is also a bloody annoying authentication scheme requiring you to re-authenticate periodically while browsing the site.
That's it. Altogether about 883 MB of content, not including the duplicate video formats. Not a lot, these days, for the price. Only took me an evening to download it all. The
bottom line is, I don't recommend it. It's a shame, because Chloe's such a deserving subject. Give a year, if they keep up with the pace of the updates they've promised, and vary the themes of the sets a bit, (or fire the photographer and get a pro with some imagination) there'll probably be enough there to justify joining for a month."