The judge in the Michael Jackson case just allowed the accusers mom to plead the 5th to any questions related to her illegal welfare payments, but she can testify about anything else she wants.
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...n&sid=84439559
This means that Mark Furhman could have pled the 5th to all questions about
using the word hahahahahaha and still testified against OJ.
He would never have convicted of perjury and he could still own a hand gun, still be a cop and still have his right to vote.
The prosecution told Furhman that they would go into that area. In fact F. Lee Bailey could have never asked the question(durring cross examination, that is) if the prosecution had not opened that area of questioning. So he knew it was comming.
I guess he's dumber than anybody he ever called a hahahahahaha.
