Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Platinum Rinaldo
It isn't an issue of whether they're wild or not. They're not naturally supposed to be in that area so they must be removed. Look what the rabbit and the pig did to austrailia or the snake did to many islands. You can't introduce a predator and not have another predator that will balance it's effects out and keep it in check.
The house cat breeds and has litters of up to 8 kittens at a time and can out run any natural predator in north america so it's in essence unstobbable. It's reaking havoc on natural wildlife such as quail and dove and rabbit populations and nothings able to stop them. How is killing them evil?
My dad's hunting lease went to shit because the quail were all wiped out within 3 years of the cats moving to that area. Now we see them walking around fat as shit. YOu know they just ate a squirrel or a rabbit. Imagine if they kill all the pretty little birds all you peta fuckers "watch". FUck the cats. You don't see wild dogs killing everything in site because tehy can't.
THis isn't a law allowing the shooting of pets, there are no pets in these wildlife areas... I've seen wild dogs and they'er m eaner than all hell... you shoot them too becuase they're dangerous (if they approach you) but a dog can't outrun a panther or a bear.
|
exactly. I watched a documentary on Predators, cats were the #1 predator because they hunt NOT FOR FOOD but pleasure. They kill everything. They are a nuisance to wildlife.
i can careless what people say here, i knew i would gtet shit for posting my opinion (i always do)
people can sit a home and give their cats milk, they forget milk is bad for cats and that cats are not good for wildlife, but hey, its all good. These people will step over a human being (bum) to get into Petco and buy their cat a $6 play toy meanwhile humans are dying.