Quote:
|
Originally Posted by CDSmith
Such as? It's not very productive of you to make this statement and then fail to point out said holes.
All things considered I'd say that is a pretty good article. If you watch a lot of CSI you might be under the impression that the police are only interested in finding the exact truth, when in fact they are often most interested in "nailing the perp."
|
Well, first let me say this, CSI is a television show. If that is the basis of your argument then I could say something like "Well, if I get arrested and jailed and I am innocent, I'll call the A-Team and they'll save me in the pursuit of justice," or if they're unavailable, any other TV show where the good guys prevail. But, since you want some examples, heres what struck me as interesting
"Force the law enforcement agents to work only with the evidence they have."
Um, I am not sure if this is limited to the interrogation room or what, but if the government wants information, they'll get it. If you don't give them the information they want, they'll get a warrant and get it themselves.
Another one that caught my attention was
"They enacted and enforce that law, so it is best for every citizen not to speak to a federal investigator about anything, ever."
This is just absurd. I don't think I would be incriminating myself if I asked an FBI agent which way the bathroom was, or what time the parade was going to start.
Sure, sometimes it might be in your best interest to plead the Fifth, but for the most part I think that this article shouldn't be taken too seriously.
