Originally Posted by ITG-Obi

It's amazing how you redefined gravity as a push and not a pull. Like saying that matter(earth..etc) is void, and space otherwise. Yours is not valid coz its not even a theory, well in lay man's terms it can be called a theory, but the thing is, in science a hypothesis, is simply a hypothesis if it doesn't have any proof. A hyphothesis will be a theory if it lacks proof or evidence but has some proofs which still needs verification but it doesnt mean there's NO proof at all. You might argue that you gave proof, what you gave is merely an anology created by an imaginative mind(most probably high).

Well, yours is simply an entertaining well thought of idea with no proof at all. You just switched definitions and you already call it a valid theory? I beg to disagree.

Oh yeah, Laws of gravity is a law not a theory, a law is a fact and you cant dispute a fact coz it's simply is. Unless you're a God and wants to recreate how the universe works.