Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nydahl
honestly Charly I think you are making 1 mistake.Ok lets say idea is great.Lets say content (whatever it is) is topnoch.But the sources of traffic are still the same - that is very important and maybe more important then the quality level of the content.
Also you said its impossible to copy the idea in a short time.Ok when did they start it up?Considering tech equipment they must have started like 3 years ago (using 3 mpix olympus - joke)- if not then its just a metter of time (not so long) to copy that.4 000 000 is nothing , you can't even a buy a good house in Prague for this change.
If the idea is so great then somebody copy that and make that investmet pretty fast - you might be surprised.
Also you mentioned conv. ratios 1:200 comparing with 1:50 - man do you have an idea what it takes to get any paysite on 1:200 ??
Maybe I am not right but ussual paysite is about 1:1500 , good 1 is about 1:900 and the top sites must be like 1 :300 - maybe I am not right and pls correct my numbers if so.
I run www.outdoorpiss.com for few days with excl. content (and its very niche site) and it looks like it converts in 1:250 (too soon to judge) but its very hard to do it man , very hard. |
That's what i said, he cannot guarantee any 1:50 ratios at all ( no one can ). He said he was new to this part of the industry and at all, he got no clue what he is talking about. You're quite right about the numbers, it all depends on the kind of traffic affiliates send to the site. A overall ratio of 1:50 is impossible even with cheap trials or anything.