Quote:
|
Originally Posted by European Lee
Great idea but useless now that the program knows which URL to watch out for.
Positive shaving is really easy to do, moreso than negative shaving, it is also one of the oldest trics in the book ;)
Regards,
Lee
|
This gets my vote for the funniest post of the week
Lee, to answer your concern about "positive shaving" (that term just makes me laugh):
#1. I don't know who Koshka is. There is no username by the name of Koshka in our program, so I am assuming he used a different name when signing up. It's not like he is the only webmaster in our program. I don't know what his sites are (he didnt mention it here), or his email (he didnt mention it here), or his real name (he didnt mention it here), or even his webmaster referral code (he didnt mention it here) so even if I wanted to, I could not find him.
#2. For the integrity of this "test", maybe Koshka can come on here and confirm the fact that we do not know who he is. And let me say this, I sure as hell will not be going around giving free money to Koshka or anyone else who has not earned it. I am a nice guy, but we will go broke pretty fast trying to give people free money.
#3. Our program is powered by NATS. I have seen your posts about how any software can be shaved and etc. etc. For now, NATS is unshavable, unless I see proof otherwise, which to this date no one has been able to provide. The reason why we went with NATS in the first place was because of the integrity behind NATS. So I don't see how I can "positively shave" him. But if there is a way, I am sure you will let us all know Lee.