View Single Post
Old 04-04-2005, 05:55 PM  
quant
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 53
Theoritically, it's a good idea. Content is king and allowing more people to supply that content should improve the choice of quality. However, it is still -one- channel and -one- channel only. There is nothing extraordinary about the network nor is there any real chance it will succeed in its current form. It's not going to give a voice to everybody, rather just highlight the select few that garner the most advertising revenue.

The Google connection is superficially good, but I'm not sure I want my TV news based on what people search on Google.

An ABC article says: "Sergey Brin, the 31-year old co-founder of Google, praised the channel as an effective way to distribute video in a way that frees it from the limited bandwidth and other technological challenges that has kept it from being widely available on the Web."

Eureka! What a great discovery...spend $70 million on an old dinosaur of a TV network, trick the public into producing the content and claim revolution! What will Al Gore think of next? He's clearly the greatest innovator ever.
quant is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote