Quote:
Originally posted by heymatty
Charly,
You would do well to remember an Internet amateur and a MAGAZINE amateur are not the same thing.
Your preachy attitude is bringing me down, I might have to stop reading the content providers spamming threads. Wich is a pity because I get good ideas in them.
Your boring sideswipes about being a pornographer are BS, what you are is an oldschooler who never made a dime off the net. You shoot Eastern European whores on a cheap budget set against tacky 1970's sets, then tell guys who shoot real US/UK amateurs in real setings they are not pornographers.
You should relax and grow up, or head straight back to magazine land.
Not like me to flame but damn your posts are annoying.
|
Sorry for being such a pain, I know there is a difference between the magazine definition for amateur and the internet.
But this is how little you know about what you think you are doing, being a pornographer. The pictures I posted were not shot by me we just by them in. They were shot by a UK photographer shooting girls in their own homes. You could not see it could you.
I wonder if the surfer see the difference between magazines and Internet, as much as some webmasters think their is. Or are we only after the surfer who cannot afford a magazine or will put up with poor quality.
Right do not make a cent off the net, only here to annoy people.