View Single Post
Old 03-30-2005, 03:03 PM  
TheLegacy
SEO Connoisseur
 
TheLegacy's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Brantford, Ontario
Posts: 17,455
Quote:
Originally Posted by ronaldo
I agree entirely.

Who's benefitting from assisted suicide being illegal?

As always, the lawyers.

The "Victim" is being lost in the whole thing.

People are screaming that this is inhumane, but it's easy to scream that when one of the other options is illegal and the only OTHER option is YOURS.

IF, and I say IF, her husband is being honest, then I think he'd have preferred the Kevorkian treatment as well. As I'm sure would Terry Schiavo. But, unfortunately that's not an option.

The only options are being "Inhumane", or forcing her to live.
and that was the point I was trying to drive at from the beginning - obviously her husband doesnt want the humane treatment.. much less the medical professionals

- yet if this was happening to the Pope and it was decided that he should be allowed to die - Im sure that everyone would be screaming that we are letting him starve to death and if the church had approved of this method - we would be crying that it was torture
__________________
SEO Connoisseur


Microsoft Teams: Robert Warren SEO
Telegram: @TheLegacy54
RobertWarrenSEO.com
TheLegacy is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote