View Single Post
Old 03-29-2005, 12:34 PM  
Alex From San Diego
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,642
We are not accusing NATS of intentionally shaving so lets get that clear.
We are simply stating back to original statement that tracking issues were an issue for us among a few other things. There was not a fix for this so we had to switch to another check processor. I have nothing bad either to say about the other check processor, we just wanted to use EC as our primary for check processing.

If a company says they support a specific biller then they should honor that and not just have it up on their site and when you are live find out they really don't. It sucks to have to make a business decision based on software restrictions.
__________________
We are what we repeatedly do.-Aristotle
Alex From San Diego is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote