Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SomeCreep
Interesting. This is the first time I hear of a big affiliate program switching from NATS to MPA3. Personally, I prefer NATS over MPA3, mainly because MPA3 has a built in shaving feature, which can serve absolutely no good purpose for affiliates.
|
Have to love comments by the clueless.
To save retyping crap my own view on it from an ICQ conversation I was having....
***: But will people trust mpaX ?
tipsy: thats the problem but to an extent more fool them
tipsy: MPA learnt a very hard lesson and are highly unlikely to repeat the mistake so I'd trust them more than most at the moment
***: Oh yes
***: And people have a short attention span/memory
tipsy: true - then you gotta take into account it's all about bottom line/sales and if that increases, cant see how the system they use matters
tipsy: Of course there are many not bright enough to see that. Their loss and for the most part they'll not send many /any sales anyway so more for the rest of us
Now may just have to get my ass into gear and retry J&A again.
