Quote:
|
Originally Posted by theking
Stop loss has been military policy since the Korean Conflict and I suspect always will be so. I believe that 40% are Reservists/National Guard. This is because the Congress during President Bush Senior's term ordered an end force reduction and base closings that were continued through out President Clinton's terms in office. Because of the end force reductions...the Pentagon had to re-organize and re-align forces...and it became necessary to place heavy dependence upon integration of the Reserves and National Guard during a crisis. Blame the Congress...President Bush Senior and President Clinton for going along with Congress.
FYI...it was not until the Korean Conflict that the military developed a rotation policy. During the Second World War...your enlistment was duration without rotation.
|
My point is not to apportion blame for stop loss or argue about it's precedent or validity, but rather to suggest that it's being used to cook the books. Clearly a draft is not something anyone wants to even mention, but it would be foolhardy to think that it's not actively considered.
Thomas