Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Odin88
If you have a sample charly (which you should I guess) just upload it in a day or two and post it in this thread. You'll get some work, noone will claim you can't do it, and that will be the end of that. Rather than writting a 10,000 word response you could of just said 'I'll upload a sample when I get to the office on Monday'. That is of course if you have a sample, but if you don't than I guess you can't really claim you know, because you haven't actually done it first hand.
|
What I said was I know how it was shot and I know who can shoot it. I think I do have a sample and will try to find it and upload it.
How many times do you think I've worked as a camera man or stills photographer on a pro shoot? On those shoots I do not end up with the master tape.
This is the problem with people on the Internet they tend to think as if the whole porn industry operates as they do.
Listen to EROTEEK he obviously knows what he's talking about. Interesting about the HD, I would of thought it would compress better. Thanks for the advice, only reason to buy a HD camera then is for the DVD and Cable market.
But I still think they're using pro cameras. The color balance of the stills is very close to that of the movies, which may mean they are off the film. Can someone grab one and see if the info in the image gives any clues. I can't on my home computer.
But what this thread keeps going on about is the quality of the camera and that is the easiest part. What few can see is the quality of the producer/director/cameraman. Of course I would like to see a full scene, but from the samples I would say these guys know what they are doing. The crew will be the hardest to get.
I can drive fast in my Ford, but I'm under no illusions that I can race a Formula 3 car. Give most people a top of the line camera and they would not know what end to point.
This is from a Gonzo shoot I used to do back in the early 90s. POV blow jobs were no fun.
