View Single Post
Old 03-18-2005, 01:28 PM  
FightThisPatent
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by LegendaryLars
I dont understand people complaining about shaving..

The simple answer is that it's a breach of contract.

Through this exploration, it's clear that there are many "creative" ways of managing the payouts when having the bankroll to handle the float isn't available.

So shaving could be a variable in the equation for a paysite to factor in when it comes to high PPS models (or high revshare models).... almost to the point that if it happens, "get over it" is what seems to be attitude.

And right to your point Lars, watching your VPC, RPC, Impressions/Rev, etc is a way to monitor what's making economic sense to you. Whether there is shaving, bad member retention (content), etc .... the affiliate webmaster does need to watch and track the performance of their campaigns.


Fight the Floaties!
__________________

http://www.t3report.com
(where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
http://www.FightThePatent.com
| ICQ 52741957
FightThisPatent is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote