Quote:
|
Originally Posted by fudpuck
Indeed. But the main driving force behind the seatbelt laws are insurance rates. It's cheaper to not have to fix people when they have a wreck, than it is to put them back together because they weren't restrained.
I'm totally down for survival of the fittest, though.
|
And...That leads right back to my Civil Suit reform point...
If you couldn't get an insurance settlement because you were too stupid to wear a seatbelt, the rates wouldn't go up. Not to mention the taxes that we would save which are created by enforcement of the seatbelt laws and support of the court systems.
Make putting them back together their problem, not the insurance company's.