Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jayeff
And one assumes they have made a calculated judgement that they are better off not showing the numbers separately... leaving us to guess at what the reason might be.
There's no doubt money to be made chucking traffic at AFF and I imagine that the recent spate of geo ads has resulted in a lot more traffic going their way. But I have a suspicion that if webmasters could more easily see how little of that traffic is responsible for their income, they might filter it more carefully. That is presumably what AFF want to avoid.
|
EXACTLY, well kinda, you see it works both ways, instead of me just "chuckin" traffic at em blindly, I would filter it, and be able to figure out which traffic is converting better for em and send em more of that traffic.
Right now I have no way to tell if the traffic is selling or just a bunch of old members rebilling.
Their overall bidness scheme seems to be, lure em in with rebills, and hold the rebills ransome for a guarenteed amount of traffic everyday. They just want as much traffic as you can send, and if you stop sending traffic, you lose a % of your rebill cash, but we don't know how many rebills we have or if it's even worth it.. grrr
But I guess the whole "min uniques per percent" deal is a whole nother bone to pick.
