Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FunForOne
Well, you guys often seem to forget that 9/11 was not the first attack on the U.S. It wasn't even the first attack on the world trade towers.
I think we noticed a pattern that culminated on 9/11 of progressively worse attacks. During the time of these progressively worsening attacks, the U.S. did not respond with any significant policy that should anger any other country.
Only since we have responded by beginning the process of changing the source of terrorism, did the world stage publically show anger at our policy. Certain world entities' motives have been exposed for their opposition to our new policy, but it hasn't stopped their information sources from the campaign necessary to win the hearts and minds of keyboard warriors thoughtout the world.
|
you're right we are changing the source of terrorism. instead of being just a few countries it's spreading quickly.
our meddling has made us alot of enemies. since our botched attempt at democracy in iraq, we have sowed the seed of anger for thousands of other bin ladens world wide.
we need to tread lightly in fundamentalist strongholds. but instead our commander in chief cobbles together makeshift plans, and then executes them with reckless abandon.
additionally, i do not take my cues from any "world entity". i weigh the information objectively and decide for myself. it's a shame you are not capable of the same thing.
because what it comes down to, is that the end, does not justify the means.