Quote:
Originally Posted by mahoney
The case against Michael seems open and shut. Let?s review the principle facts as we know them: (1) He molested a 12-year-old boy back in 1993 and bought him off with hush money; (2) And now he?s doing it again; (3) This, as the hired shrinks tell us over and over again, is because you can?t cure a pedophile. They can?t stop themselves and they?ll just keep on doing it until you lock ?em up and throw away the key; and (4) A 45-year-old man who likes to have young boys sleep in his bed with him?this is tantamount to admitting he has a sexual fixation on pre-teen boys.
But in actuality the current case against him is, at the moment, no case at all.
|
This article supports the conclusion that he may be innocent. I thought that he was already guilty in your eyes?