Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Webby
All webmasters who are creditors of iBill have full rights in court to be paid on a due date. This has not happened. No webmaster is obliged to even listen to any iBill-appointed escrow agent. There are also other options in this instance.
|
I am not aware, nor have followed any EU court litigation, and not even sure if there is any filed. There are definitely some US cases filed, but that's not part of the EU iBill issues.
If there is an open court case in EU, then I am sure the judge would be talking to the EU Bank and talking to Inteca and probably come up with the resolution to allow the EU Bank to do the deal with Inteca to resolve the money problems.
So the "creditors" don't have any place for their "demands" about knowing about the third party escrow agent. News of what is going on is posted via CMI (though vague to webmasters), but there is not much else to do besides vent on a public board, about a matter that is private between the EU Bank, Inteca, and iBill.
The end result is that EU webmasters get paid. If this doesn't happen, then both the EU bank and the EU court systems will come down on Inteca. For Inteca to assume this kind of liability, you can only assume that they do have the right plan to execute on all of this.
Fight the Constantly Misunderstood Information!