Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr.Fiction
Why "child protection" instead of "against child porn".
The most common excuse that religious groups and poltiicians use to attack the adult industry is to "protect children".
|
I agree with you on that.. many "battles" and "wars" are done in the name of children. But now that we have Gonzales into office, there is no longer a need for anyone to pull our the "children" angle... he clearly has an anti-porn stance based on obscenity.
Alot of the battleground fireworks is usually based on the openly, easily, and available access to explicit images by children.
Using SEO tricks and outright mislabelling a site to use words like "disney" brings up porn sites for little johnny that then mommy sees, freaks out, and calls up her congressman, and then we get laws proposed.
I think that one of the key elements for self-regulation rather than imposed legislation is to not allow for explicit images in areas that don't require atleast an over18 click .. which includes blocking the sidedoors into a site via search engines, that redirect the surfer to the front door for that "over 18" link.
It's understandable that a kid could still click the link and get in, but the point is that they showed intent.. rather than accidently showing up on a page that wasn't the pokemon page they though they were looking for.
Fight the COPA!