Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Alex
Thats kind of a stupid question to ask
Why dont designers all design for themseleves and keep 100% of the profit
Why dont traffic brookers sent all of it to thier own affiliate links
Why dont Content Providers use content for thier own paysites.
|
Quote:
|
Why dont designers all design for themseleves and keep 100% of the profit
|
you honestly do not see the difference between knowing photoshop and running and maintaining a network of paysites?
Let's continue with your flawed logic and keep asking the same rediculous questions... "why doesn't a designer just Learn Maya, 3D Studio Max, Linux, SQL, PHP, ASP, .NET, C++, PERL and create a flight reservation system for Luftansa and American Airlines and host it himself, manage the servers and provide technical support while updating the content, the designs and handling all customer support calls?... because obviously he would make a lot of money!"
Quote:
|
Why dont Content Providers use content for thier own paysites.
|
see above, only substitute "photoshop" with "camera" where appropriate
Quote:
|
Why dont traffic brookers sent all of it to thier own affiliate links
|
two reasons.
first, its too much unnecessary work.
second, its unnecessary work because people will always pay more for traffic than its worth and it is less headaches to sell it than to manage it, filter it and optimize its value... usually, they will pay cash upfront. why does MSN sell traffic for .25/click?... because idiots will pay for it.
any more challenging questions on Web Business 101? this is kinda fun.
I am not saying he is not a nice guy with good intentions. I am just saying that this is a little fishy and apparently others agree. what idiot who wants to get in business and make money, wants to invest in a project where "some guy" owns all the domains he is driving traffic to and what type of person would expect someone to agree to that?
Even the pirate agrees its silly.