View Single Post
Old 05-07-2002, 05:58 PM  
vidsweb
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Pornland
Posts: 698
Quote:
Originally posted by Armed & Hammered


Well, basically the same thing happened with Afghanistan. We asked that those that were responsible be handed over to us. They refused. By refusing, they basically said "fuck you". Now, the Afghan "government" was not a UN recognized government, which I am sure prevented us from acting more harshly against the country. Had it been a true government that refused to turn over those responsible for a major attack on US soil, they are basically supporting terror and should then be wiped off the face of the planet. If a country is truly for peace and one or more of their citizens carries out a major attack against another country, they will turn the terrorists over immediately as well as aid the victim country in gathering intelligence and making arrests within their country. As long as that happens, we'll all be fine.
Yeah, the country where the attackers came from might help and hand over the rest of those who are responsible, but thats all after the fact that a nuclear bomb was exploded in the US.

The real question here is: Can the US prevent another major attack against itself?

Warren Buffet is just being realistic. He knows that there is a good chance that there will be another major attack.
__________________
Just give'r
vidsweb is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote