Many folks claim to be advocates of free speech and then get upset when they see such "art" sites.
While such sites offend many people, so does the content of most adult sites - censorship is a slippery slope ...
Going to digress a bit - how come such "art" sites offends so many here and yet images on consumptionjunction.com, ogrish.com, and rotten.com don't?
Often the argument is put forward that the possession of a picture showing a crime, in particular child porn, itself is a crime - if so, then why aren't the many pictures depicting beheadings, shootings, etc shown on the three above mentioned sites illegal too?
Of course the simple answer is "morals" ... and that's opens a pandara box of questions ... so while it's understandable for many folks to dislike "art" sites, going after them too hard leads to situations in which law-abidding adult site operators can be targeted too, such as depicting *age 18+* models as appearing to be younger; merely implying they are younger and/or depicting them in certain types of scenes, such as cheerleader practice, has become risky ... and to reiterate I'm speaking of age 18+ models!
I'm not saying such "art" content is desirable, but folks concerned about freedom of speech (everyone in this business should be!) need to be wary of overreaction.
Lastly, to be clear, I agree with many others here in that "art" sites are certainly something that should NOT be associated with GFY, since this is not an "art" discussion site
Ron