Quote:
|
Originally Posted by PerfectionGirls
Dude, put that little sound bite back into its context. Read below.
"I agree to an extent, but all of what you used as examples are well within the limits of the law. While i do not care for gay content or the lifestyle I dont try to moralize, condem or push my personal views on others. I dont like it, I dont look. I see this as a different issue all together. Its not a moral issue for me at all. Ive pushed teen solo site girls since the day I started, all within the limits of the law and never dressing down a girl to look younger then she is. Making them look cute with a pony tail or something is one thing... making them look 12 or 13 is quite another. What I see here is a program using an illegal media in a legal fashion."
Tell me she does not look 12.
 |
You said you don't push your personal views unto others, yet that's what you are doing. Context is irrelavant in this statement of yours.
Actually, she looks 16 to me. Ugly 16, but still 18 none the less. Some people just look young to begin with. I had a girlfriend who was 19 and looked 14. It just happens. There ARE sites that go too far with it, as MET did in the past, they went out of their way to make the girls look 12 and pre-pubescent. That's why nobody touched them until as of late when they got their act together.
I understand your points about the whole matter and agree with you on many levels of it, but attacking teenrevenue is like attacking yourself man. The girls look just as young as some of the girls you've shot in the past. Why is it different for you and not OK for them?