Quote:
|
Originally Posted by realistixxx
I love all those knocks on Bush for his environmental record. I mean, really, do you know anything about economics, and do you pay attention to politics at ALL? What have the Democrats done. They are the do-nothing party. They talk a damn good game, but they don't get anything done.
And, to the guy that said that it was one of the closest elections in history, look at the number again. Kerry got HOUSED. The country made a statement, and that statement is that the Democratic agenda is not what is right for the country. You seem to forget the seats that were lost in the house and senate. W is the first president in 100 years to win a re-election AND gain seats in the house and senate.
Another thing, if you take a look at the Democratic party, the only way a Democrat can win anything these days, unless you live in Mass., is by running as a CONSERVATIVE. That's why Hillary is changing her tune real fast. She's practically been a Republican for the past 3 months.
This country is a conservative country my friends. Like it or not. The last election was a statement election, meaning, all the hype put out by the press, all the talk about Kerry winning, and he failed miserably. If you listened to the press, you would've thought that Bush wasn't even in the ballpark. Bottom line, Bush won, and he won BIG.
|
Anytime from now on you find yourself listening to a democrat talk politics, you are doing it for entertainment purposes only.
Democrats blasted the south after the election. Let me ask a question without trying to offend anyone.
When is the last time the democrats elected a president from above the mason dixon line?
The problem with the rest of the world and most teenage webmasters is that they are only getting their news from sources that are irrelevant.
The New York times can endorse anyone candidate or party they want, but the truth is that they are pretty much irrelevant.
An irrelevant source as an axe to grind because it is irrelevant.