the age that they look and their real age are two different things... however, i'd have to say that they look eighteen plus compared to some of the girls that i go to college with. whether they are or not is another matter. if they are below a legal age, well... exploitation is pretty shitty.
posing nude at 16/17 is a sensitive issue. age of consent here is 16, sex is accepted at that age, and people don't even think twice about it. by watching the 'barely legal' video series ("hey... i'm 18 now! lets fuck!") it seems that 18 is the accepted age in the usa. so who is right? and does it matter that someone can't fuck a 16/17 year old in their home country, but if they jump on a plane and fly a few thousand miles to europe, they can fuck their brains out with a 'consenting' 16/17 year old guy/girl? personally i don't see how somebody suddenly becomes consenting the second that they hit 16/18/whatever years old. it can't be unacceptable to fuck an hour before the 17th birthday, but perfectly acceptable to fuck 61 minutes later when someone hits 18. thats just laughable. it should be a matter of maturity, as some people don't mature until they're like 25, i'd have to say that nobody is really right on this issue. however, i wouldn't show a bias either way. now discuss.
