Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dig420
There's more brilliance and creativity in two lines of that article than you'll ever demonstrate in your entire life, I don't care how you're voting for. To deny it is like sticking your hand over your eyes and thinking nobody can see you.
Historically, I hate the Dems. They were the shitty party until the Dixie Democrats broke off and took their southern fried hatred and misogyny over the Republicans, where they're enjoying absolute control of their new party. Yep, the Dems have been pussies, afraid and too ethical to fight back against Republican sleazy tactics in the recent past, but I think you're about to see a change in that modus operandi with the emergence of Howard Dean in the top spot of the party heirarchy.
|
Digboy, you don't know me from adam. You post an article that claims that the left have no method of rebuttal and no outlet for liberal ideas that are not instantly squashed by the right. Instead of calling you a fag, or criticising your creativity, I went to a neutral source, pulled up actual facts and posted them. There are more anti-bush books than clinton ones. It is easier to find them. They sell better. This seems to be a disconnect between article's argument and the truth.
The end text of your linked article:
OK, we're going to call the above "Exhibit A."
Now, everyone on that list has done at least a dozen hit pieces on Clinton.
My question is, Where is "Exhibit B?"
When those 38 people attack Clinton and his cock, who does the rebuttal?
My Answer was to post several dozen exhibit Bs with sales figures (amazon sales rank) easily found. How does this make me uncreative?