GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post

Brad Mitchell · 05-01-2002, 05:38 PM

The biggest problem I see with that is this:

"Prohibit offers to sell or provide, and efforts to obtain, child pornography, regardless of whether depictions are actually provided or received. "

So if I link to a teen site with obviously legal content of girls 18+ but have a text link that says "Click here for teens fucking!" that would be illegal because of "whether depictions are actually provided or received. " - obviously there would be nothing illegal received by going to that site but I'm wondering how they're going to draw the line on how we describe our advertisements.

I mean, some of the stuff is obvious - words like lolita, preteen, etc but what about general references? If we said those words were prohibited that would absolutely be censorship.

Brad

05-01-2002, 05:38 PM
Brad Mitchell Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Southfield, MI Posts: 9,812	The biggest problem I see with that is this: "Prohibit offers to sell or provide, and efforts to obtain, child pornography, regardless of whether depictions are actually provided or received. " So if I link to a teen site with obviously legal content of girls 18+ but have a text link that says "Click here for teens fucking!" that would be illegal because of "whether depictions are actually provided or received. " - obviously there would be nothing illegal received by going to that site but I'm wondering how they're going to draw the line on how we describe our advertisements. I mean, some of the stuff is obvious - words like lolita, preteen, etc but what about general references? If we said those words were prohibited that would absolutely be censorship. Brad __________________ President at MojoHost \| brad at mojohost dot com \| Skype MojoHostBrad 71 industry awards for hosting and professional excellence since 1999