|
Once, just ONCE, I'd like to see an owner pay a player 50% of his salary because his performance sucked.
Player's have no problem holding out for more money when they have ONE good year, so why the hell not?
Lock out that ONE player until he agrees to a salary reduction.
How fast would a breach of contract lawsuit take in that case?
Why an owner didn't try suing a player for breach of contract when he held out, I'll never know.
|