View Single Post
Old 02-13-2005, 08:59 PM  
tony286
lurker
 
tony286's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: atlanta
Posts: 57,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by Webby
Inclined to agree!

One of the fundamental problems with third party processing is that there is nada protection/insurance for the clients of these companies.

In a way, they are almost like a bank in that their job is transacting other people's money, - but with no controls or oversight.

In the EU these types of companies are often regulated/audited by govt orgs and, who knows, but that may have something to do with iBill retaining operations in the US where there is no control over them.

Should these proposals happen, it may be the start of an improvement and may also be a scenario that may appeal more to banks to be involved in.

Either way.. I smell an increase in Euro transactions and also new transaction processing models in the EU and out of the hands of the North American VISA banking region - and, maybe at arms length with any card companies

I agree with you there is nada protection its a flawed model. To start a casino and get a gaming license there must so much money in escrow to cover certain amount of winnings I forgot the number. These third party processors doesnt have to have anything aside, no oversight ,no spot checks by auditors and its scary.
tony286 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote