Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Wolfy
I promise I won't cum in your mouth. 
Where the hell did Swedguy go, he's the one who's supposed to be taking action. Swedguyyyyyy... Swwwwweeeeeeeeeeeeeeedguyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy....... ... |
Sorry, I needed some sleep
A lot of valid points has been expressed and I'm happy some people has woken up and realized something needs to be done instead of just defending CCBill blindly. Don't take me wrong, I have nothing against CCBill. But if I see an issue, I address it.
First time I saw this in action was a long time ago (the sponsor is long gone). When I saw it I didn't think much of it until couple of days later. I emailed CCbill and asked why the webmaster ID's didn't match up and they answered everything is in order because I had cookies turned on so the cookie will be used. I trusted them and went on with business.
Some time later I noticed another sponsor that used the same form variable, that's when I figured something was up and has since tried to get a proper answer from CCBill, with no luck.
As one person has showed, this feature has a valid use, but it is also being abused. The same thing as with the "stop paying after X rebills", where CCBill stepped up and made the info available to the webmaster. That time you protected the webmaster, what about this time?