|
True true... So then a simple and effective solution would be ccBill adds a rule to their terms, and allows webmasters to finger any sponsor that chooses to use that particular option in ways that rob hard working webmasters of their rightful earnings.
Anybody see a problem with this solution?
I say bump this thread untill that becomes a reality. I am only here because I saw the same thing with a ccBill sponsor a long time ago, chose not to use them, and have since forgotten which sponsor it was. It may even be the same sponsor that Swedguy ran into for all I know - the point is, there's no excuse to allow a sponsor to rob a webmaster and if this thread makes a good system better then we should make it happen.
(Edit-AlienQ, we typed at the same time :P)
|